Skip to main content

Discrimination is a bad thing right? Or is it?

Hello again Dear Reader,

So, do we all agree that discrimination is basically a no-no? That in the 21st century we have evolved enough to say that discriminating against someone based on their gender, sexuality, race, religion or age is pretty much a crap thing to do.

We've had so many bloody years of people being treated poorly due to any number of reasons that we applaude any action taken to address the negatives that still exist in pockets through our society. So it was with a bit of frustration that I noted the following headline in our national media yesterday (and no, not a trash tabloid but a fair dinkum outlet):

AFP announces female-only recruit round

Now to set the context, you have to know that the AFP has stated that the current female proportion of 22% of the workforce is not acceptable and that they aim to increase that level to 50% over the next decade. Fair enough I say. There's probably a whole swag of strategies that could be employed to increase the level, in particular removing any possible outdated discriminatory regulations that negatively impact female recruitment and also looking at ways of improving female officer retention.

But what are we actually doing by actively targeting females only? Unless my logic is faulty, I always assumed that when you preference one group over another, someone is being dudded. In this case, males.

Now I know this might get a few noses out of joint. You know, females have been discriminated against for so long, it's time to get it right, to turn the tables. Give them a go for a change. But is this what we are doing here?

I'm all for adressing imbalances in society, ensuring that there are no discriminatory practices in place that negatively target females. But when a government agency proudly proclaims that for the rest of the year they are only interested in talking to you if you are a girl, that doesn't seem to me like a positive response to a workforce imbalance. It's gender discrimination pure and simple.

To put this in perspective, let's have a look at the nursing workforce in Australia. In 2012, the average percentage male nurse representation was 10%. And it's around about the same now.

Now keep in mind that the health profession (much like the AFP) is doing nothing actively to discriminate against males, it's just that the profession can't seem to recruit or retain a higher percentage. Can you imagine if all government hospitals around Australia proclaimed that as a measure to increase the percentage of males in the workforce to address a perceived gender imbalance, for the foreseeable future they were only targeting men. Sorry girls, you'll have to wait till later. You may be more talented, be far better suited, but you have breasts. Sorry.

Would there be an outcry? Would we hear calls of discrimination? Damn right we would. Well, I sure as hell would be protesting. All people should be treated equal and be recruited based on their talent and skills......and nothing else.

And what really winds me up? The government apparently sees this as a positive thing, says 'well done' to the AFP and pats itself on the back. It's not well done, it's not addressing an imbalance and everything is not bloody ok. All it's doing is replacing one form of gender discrimination that used to exist in our workforce with another one.

And it's happening everywhere.

Thanks for tuning in Reader, and remember

Be Good to Each Other

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Remember, we only kill Black People

Hello again Dear Reader, If you've been following my blogs, you probably know by now that I usually like to be nice and rational in my blogs (well I try to anyway), just flow along and rely on the evidence to gently lead you to what I hope is a logical conclusion. Without emotion yeah. Purely objective. Usually. However.
But sometimes I get cranky and just have to raise my hand and call out hatred and plain old bigotry for what it is...evil. And yes folks, that's exactly what I mean and exactly how I feel right about now. I'm confused, I'm amazed and I'm bloody angry.
For those of you who read my blogs (do you exist?), you know I'm a big fan of the USA, it's people, it's culture and it's total acceptance of us Aussies in their land. So, how do you think I feel when I watch a for real video of an American Police Officer saying to a white, female civilian at a traffic stop, 'Remember, we only kill black people'?
What the hell? Did you really…

When Using Technology is The Crime

Hello again Dear Reader,
Today I’d like to follow up on a Blog from October titled ‘Fantasising Online. Is it a Crime?’. 
If you haven’t read it, might be worth hitting pause here and going back for a read. I can wait.

Ok, in that Blog I posed the question to you, the reader, as to whether fantasising about depraved and illegal issues is a crime in itself. 
If I fantasise online with other like minded adults about committing an illegal activity, but don’t initiate any actions or plans to follow through on my fantasies, have I already committed a crime?
Well, now I can provide an update.
Australian journalist Ben McCormack was sentenced today on child pornography charges. He received a three year good behaviour bond and a $1000 fine for having filthy and depraved discussions online with another adult male. He received no jail term, but still has a conviction and will be a registered sex offender.
Now, here I have to take a bit of a quick legal diversion. Sorry. McCormack pleaded guilty to two…

Same sex Marriage and Teen Suicide Prevention

Hello again Dear Reader,
Today I’d like to take the opportunity to follow up on yesterday’s Blog ‘Where is the Love’, which begged the question...when is a loving relationship wonderful and acceptable to society and when is it not? When discussing the recent ‘Yes’ vote for same-sex marriage in Australia, one reader noted that “they predict the incident (sic) of young lives lost to suicide will decrease” as a result. 
And you know what? I bloody hope that ‘their’ prediction is spot on. Anything, absolutely anything, that can be done to save the lives, and even improve the quality of life, for our youth is to be welcomed and encouraged. So, if allowing two consenting same-sex couples to marry does that, let’s hurry up with changing the law and get out the wedding bells.


But. And I can’t help asking this, it’s in my nature. Who are ‘they’? Who made this prediction and discovered the causal factor link between youth suicide and the non-legalisation of same-sex marriages? What data or evidenc…